UPDATE: Woman Cited for Failure to Yield in Hwy. LL and Sunset Road Crash
Two cars were involved and the Flight for Life helicopter transported a Thiensville woman from the scene, and the Ozaukee County Sheriff's Office has determined that woman failed to yield, causing the crash.
View Larger Map
A Thiensville woman is being cited for failure to yield, causing a crash at the intersection of Highway LL and Sunset Road in Port Washington earlier this month.
After an Ozaukee County Sheriff's Office investigation and reconstruction of the accident, Port Washington Police Chief Kevin Hingiss said the department will be issuing a citation to Thiensville resident Tammie Flanders, who had been driving her car west on Sunset Road. The crash resulted in five injuries, with Flanders being transported by Flight for Life to Froedtert Hospital in Milwaukee and the others via ambulance to local hospitals after the Aug. 16 evening crash.
Flanders was the driver of a car that also had two children passengers, was transported. Though no specific details are available about her injuries, hospital officials say she has been released. The children, ages 8 and 14, were transported via ambulance to Aurora Medical Center in Grafton.
The driver of the other car was 17-year-old Henry Watry and his 22-year-old brother Nicholas Watry, both of Port Washington. They were also transported to Aurora in Grafton.
Port Washington Police Chief Kevin Hingiss said as far as he knows all of the patients have been released. The vehicle driven by Henry Watry was headed south on Hwy. LL and Flanders had been driving west on Sunset Road before the collision.
The intersection of Sunset Road and Hwy. LL is known to have a high number of accidents, and the County Board approved a reduced speed limit — from 45 mph to 35 mph — in June.
The Wisconsin Incident Alert notification about the accident was sent at 5:38 p.m. Flight for Life was on the ground at 5:55 p.m. The Flight for Life helicopter left the scene just after 6 p.m.
Jill
6:28 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
This is the worst intersection in Port that always has car crashes. I live in the Greystone subdivision. It is poorly lit at night and too fast of a speed limit (45 mph). It going to take the city a death(or two) to make this safer!!
Lyssa Beyer
7:10 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
The county approved a reduced speed limit on Hwy. LL in June. Here's details: http://portwashington-wi.patch.com/articles/reduced-hwy-ll-speed-approved
Paulette Belmarce
7:30 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
It needs a stop light or flashing red lights. the reduced speed limit has done nothing...
Jill
7:35 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Unfortunately the speed reduction hasn't done anything. The road has a higher traffic volume and a big, long open span for driving, so people don't obey it any better than the other posted mph signs in the city. MPH reduction has always been the city's #1 go to for incidents. They need to seriously move beyond this and put up MORE signs like on hwy 33 and a 4 way stop.
Jill
7:39 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Perhaps a lawsuit from an injured will change their(city) minds. Again, I just pray that all involved are ok. But this intersection angers me.
Heather Iverson
8:00 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
I agree with Jill. I live in Sunset Rd apartments and i always see accidents there. People don't honestly care about the speed reduction (even though they'll be speeding right past the justice center lol). Maybe they should put a round about there instead of so many on 33...a stop light would work too but that costs electricity. I mean if people werent stupid and actually paid attention to the stop signs there wouldnt be as many problems...unfortunately people are incompetant and fly through it anyway so it obviously isnt helping stop any accidents.
Patrick Modjeski
8:45 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
A great place for a round-about...along with Sunset and Spring St....
Mary L Diener
10:05 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Visibility-wise, both are terrible but Sunset and Spring is horrendous. It's taking your life in your hands sometimes just trying to go directly across Spring St. A round-about would be a good solution in both cases.
jackie
8:56 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
I was in a accident there about 4 years ago, had my son, we were both ok. I totally agree in putting a round a bout or a stop light,
Mike
12:37 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Maybe drivers need to learn how to drive in the round a bouts first. I was hit a few weeks ago in one. Drivers do not slow down to 15 mph but actually speed up trying to beat the cars that are already in the round a bouts.
Pat
6:07 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
THE ACCIDENT WASN'T IN A ROUNDABOUT... IT WAS AT A CONVENTIONAL INTERSECTION WITH STOP SIGNS AT A CROSSROAD AND TRAFFIC ON THE INTERSECTING ROAD NOT REQUIRED TO STOP. YOU CAN'T MAKE ROADS ACCIDENT FREE AS HUMAN ERROR WILL ALWAYS BE A FACTOR.
Angel days
8:16 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
The great thing about round-abouts though is that it reduces the chance of life threatening injuries because you have to go slower. I agree, people don't know how to use them yet but that is because they are new to most. People will eventually figure that out. I know the people involved. Everyone survived with minor injuries.
Mike
6:25 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
We know it wasn't a round a bout. Readers were suggestiing maybe it should be changed to a round a bout for safety reasons and my comment is many people don't know how to drive in a round a bout.
Tom Kamenick
6:38 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
It annoys me how much road engineering has to pander to crappy drivers.
Vic
6:46 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Couldn't agree more.
Jill
6:43 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Tom, as one who says they are involved with public safety, when an area of roadway has had so many accidents for many many many years that should tell you that crappy drivers aren't the only problem. Clearly this intersection has had so many accidents I wonder if the city can even count that high. Unfortunately drivers aren't perfect and neither are engineers.
Vic
6:48 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
"Crappy drivers" should be kept off the roads, driving is not a right.
Jill
6:54 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Vic, I don't disagree with you there but that's another story in itself. Try driving this intersection multiple times a day with your family on board and see the near misses coming at you where you slam on the brakes and pray. Yes, unfortunately you have people who don't pay attention, text and drive, and are just plainly poor drivers but that doesn't give us a safer intersection. It's the innocent people who are constantly getting injured here because of some disregard no matter what it may be.
CatMM
6:57 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
How many accidents are we talking about? I have lived very near here (in the Bley Park subdivision) for almost 20 years and this is the first accident I have ever been aware of.
I know there have been quite a few accidents on Sunset and Spring St. The road is at such an angle that its hard to see cars coming from both ways.
Why would there need to be another stop sign or roundabout at LL and Sunset? People who come to the stop sign need to actually stop and wait until its clear.
Jill
7:08 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Patty, let me say that I had worked for PWFD for years (past tense) and rescue calls are sent here constantly. Several times per month at times. Talk to a fellow police officer or EMT/firefighter and they can tell you. I also live in Greystone and often assist on scenes and have been a witness to many accidents. Spring and Grand, Spring and Sunset are very common areas as well for accidents too. Unfortunately the higher speeds (which supposedly are reduced to 35mph now) cause the more serious accidents on Sunset and LL.
Vic
7:12 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
"Unfortunately the higher speeds (which supposedly are reduced to 35mph now) cause the more serious accidents on Sunset and LL."
No, they don't. People blowing the stop sign do.
Jill
7:20 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
I don't believe they always "blow" the stop sign. I'm sure many have. People do not gauge the speeds of the cars traveling LL and think they can make it. I'm done arguing. If it was your family being hauled away in the ambulance or helicopter I'm sure you would want to do something to make this area a safer place to drive through.
Jim B.
7:38 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
The bottom line to vehicle safety is to drive defensively. If you don't "watch out for the other guy," you will get in an accident. I strictly adhere to this policy, and have been accident free for my total driving years of which happens to be forty-one. Hope I didn't jinx myself posting this!
Melissa Herkowski Stratton
7:41 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
i live in the harbor ridge apartments right next to that intersection and drive through it almost daily so scary
James
8:20 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Why not put stop signs for the north and south bound lanes. We live on LL just north of that intersection, and people are blowing through on the north and south bound lanes over 50 MPH regularly. Jill hit the nail on the head, people are just driving to fast on LL south of Hwy 33.
Dave
8:31 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
I drove thru that intersection speeding texting while eating a big mac I made it thru just fine
Dave
8:38 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Oh my dog was also jumping around in my front seat and I was not wearing
Betty Fields-Mueller
9:05 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
I think a four way stop is the way to go here. I live on South Spring Street and go to that gas station all the time. There is ALWAYS someone trying to cross that intersection and attempting to beat the speeding traffic coming from both ways. A few months ago I watched as my husband and daughter were in the car ahead of me also going to the gas station and a car pulled out from Sunset and Almost broadsided their car. If my husband wasn't such an attentive driver the outcome could have been tragic. He was forced to slam on his brakes and swerve to avoid a collision. That person never hesitated and just kept driving. And Dave.....You sound like an accident waiting to happen. I can only hope there is no one else near you when your luck runs out.
Rik Kluessendorf
9:43 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
The city has a number of problem intersections. From my own time on ambulance, my experience is that the most frequent crashes were at the intersections of Spring and Sunset, followed by Jackson and Franklin. Those accidents (in my experience) that happened at Sunset and LL were less frequent, but more serious.
To reduce the frequency of accidents, stop signs, stop lights, intersection redesigns (such as limiting turns, improving visibility, etc.) are usually best to address the problem. Sunset and Spring, because of its volume of traffic, is begging for a traffic light / roundabout, while that would not make any sense at Jackson and Franklin, where visibility is the main issue.
In the case of Sunset and LL, if my own experiences are true, the issue is not frequency but severity of accidents. The county, if it has done its job, should have statistics on that. If that's the case, the solution is speed control and enforcement. The reduced speed is a good start, but I anticipate that there will be a very heavy police monitoring of traffic speed around this intersection going forward.
Heather Iverson
9:57 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Sunset and spring is bad too...we've lived in sunset rd apartments for 2 years and have seen pleanty of accidents at both intersections...i think a round about would be great at LL and sunset and a stop light would prob be better for spring and sunset due to the high traffic. I really hope people in charge of city decisions sees this and that the people of this town would like something done!
Barb Zernia Eisentraut
9:57 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Maybe we should be less concerned about the road right now and maybe focus on if everyone in yesterdays accident is ok!
Greg
12:19 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
State and County highways are intended for efficient transportation of people and goods. Lowering the speed limits should be the last option. Statistics are important and need to be applied to evaluate needs. I have NEVER seen an accident at this intersection, so there can not ALWAYS be accidents there. Car counts are also important, maybe some of the focus should be moved to not having a primary highway, hwy. 33, closed for two years, for no good reason.
Rik Kluessendorf
1:55 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Greg, explain for us, if you will, how the stretch of road on LL, from Spring Street to Sunset (a distance of, perhaps a quarter mile) would, at a 10mph reduction, harm the "efficient transportation of people and goods."
The municipalities have a balance to maintain, and that is the primary needs of the roads against the safety risks of those roads. Here, if the statistics show a hazard (and I agree with you that the statistics should be the measure), perhaps a small tweak is necessary. The 10 mph reduction will cost drivers on this stretch of road about 5 seconds of time (assuming it is a quarter mile).
Greg
2:44 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Would you only reduce the speed limit there? Or would it be reduced from Hwy 33 to Spring Street? Everything is relative. By your line of thinking it's only 5 seconds (assuming it is a quarter mile). Now include reduced speeds on hwy. 33, maybe 30 seconds, and then the next speed reduction, 5 seconds? 120 seconds? and so on...Goods and people being transported by highway are usually not traveling a quarter mile. The cumulative result of speed reductions, on a trip of several hundred miles, may be measured in hours rather than seconds. Multiply that times the massive amount of miles traveled on state and county highways, and it should be easy to see the harm to the "efficient transportation of people and goods."
I do understand the want for safety, but lowering these speed limits should not be the automatic, and many times emotional, reaction to an accident. Speed limits are the inverse of taxes, in most cases when they go down they never go back up.
Betty Fields-Mueller
2:07 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Barb,
I think People are expressing their frustration with this intersection because they know that unless changes are made immediately there will continue to be accidents here. I for one am praying for the safe recovery of all involved but I also strongly believe something needs to be done to fix this dangerous intersection once and for all before there are more accidents like this.
Heather Iverson
2:27 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Greg,
I dont know how often you go through either intersection but i can see both from my front porch and there are a lot of accidents at both. They arent always big ones that require media but there are quite a few fender benders. Efficent travel is good but more important is saftey.
Greg
3:44 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Well it is good to see that the accident statistics have gone down from "always" to "a lot".
I do go through that intersection often and at different times, sometimes several times a day, but I do not live there.
Greg
4:09 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
OK, a 5 year study results showed that there are an average of 2.2 accidents at that intersection per year, with 1.6 of those accidents resulting in injury.
So the accident statistics have been downgraded from "a lot" to a couple.
Zero would be better, but it is important to know of what we speak before we decide what should be done.
Enhancing the signage with flashing LEDs has been effective at many other intersections. Grand Ave./Spring St. intersection has a higher accident rate. That is a four way, controlled intersection, with traffic signals and 25 mph speed limits. Should those roads be reduced to 15 mph?
Jill
2:35 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
From the 33 roundabout the speed limit traveling south is 35mph for a short stretch then increases to 45mph far prior to this intersection. For whatever the cause(stupidity, blowing the stop sign) a car traveling at the assumed 50mph hitting a car rolling/blowing the stop sign = serious accidents. Having police monitor speeds is a start, but does not stop a speeder unless they sit there 24/7. Increasing the safety of this intersection would require proper lighting, street signage, reduced speeds, and a 4 way stop. With a 4 way stop~ those who you think cause the accidents by blowing the stop sign can now just play bumper cars with each other instead of a t-bone situation at 40-50 mph. There is also a day care on the corner which has seen it's share of debris. Thank god they have fencing!
Dave
3:04 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Install a jump ramp on Spring street and jump over the intersection .Wait the state would install a gaint overhead sign and we would jump thru it..Maybe place a slow down sign before the intersection .Just take one off of hwy 33 no one would miss it.
Jill
3:10 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Sounds like a plan Dave! Borrow a few street lights too. Because burying the unsightly electric lines for X amount of $$$$$ was worth the beautification they achieved. Oh I did I forget to mention a major expensive bike trail that crosses not far from this intersection? I bet if we kill a biker or pedestrian then something would give.
monica
3:50 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Any updates about those involved? Understand e everyones frustrations. It is good you all are takling about the safety of the intersection. But if you feel something needs to be done, and want something done, get on the city agenda, and take it up with the board. We should be sending out positive thought and prayers to those involved.
Matthew Schroeder
4:04 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Monica: I checked with the police department but was not able to get an update today. We will provide more information as soon as we're able.
Jill
4:25 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
past data is helpful, but get a car count from this spring/summer alone. Traffic patterns have now changed. I've been to at least 3 accidents there, including a rollover. My concern IS for those involved, I've been on FFL, I've cared for innocent victims lying on their death beds in ICU. I agree this needs a rally on the agenda. And I'm glad to hear someone mentioned minor injuries to the others, hopefully the person who was flighted is also doing ok!
Heather Iverson
8:19 pm on Friday, August 17, 2012
Greg,
Stats or not i can personally SEE both intersections from my house...even if they want to say there are 2.2 accidents there a year i personally see at least 2 close calls per week between the two intersections. It is dangerous and something needs to be done. I dont think a lower speed limit would make a difference at all...but people should have to stop from all ways which would force people to slow down. Also 2.2 accidents per year is a lot considering most intersections have 0 per year. You seem too coorperate and not concerned for the saftey of the public and if you sat there and observed both intersections you too would see that something needs to change.
Greg
2:58 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
I have posted nothing that shows a lack of concerned for the safety of the public.
I have attended several County Highway Safety meetings and your type of emotional reasoning is all to common. If actions were taken, based on everyone with an observation like yours, the highway system would be in gridlock.
At one meeting a couple was requesting a 20 mph speed limit reduction, on a very busy Co. Trk. highway. They had a blind child and were concerned for her safety when she walked out to wait for the bus. Of all the options, they picked the one that would inconvenience thousands of other people, rather than themselves. Civil engineering needs to be based on factual information, not emotion.
Rik Kluessendorf
7:16 am on Sunday, August 19, 2012
Greg,
You seem to equate all reductions in speed with an "emotional reaction." The reality is that we have changing uses in highways through the pattern of development. No one here is suggesting that this accident is the reason that we need to adjust the speed limit on this particular stretch of road. Your earlier comments suggest that you don't want to separate this stretch of road from all of the others, apparently.
What we have been suggesting is that this intersection needs to be examined thoroughly from a safety standpoint. We have a number of nasty accidents here. As much as we all want to get around efficiently, we also want to get around safely. As traffic patterns change and use of an intersection increases, what was once a safe and reasonable solution may no longer be safe and reasonable. Remember, LL was originally the bypass around Port Washington (remember the wayside park that was located out towards the intersection of Green Bay Road?). No longer is this a bypass highway... it is a thoroughfare going through residential neighborhoods with more and more access roads. Plus, the roundabouts are (realistically) going to cause more people to use Sunset as an alternative to hwy 33.
I think questioning this stretch of road is extremely reasonable at this point in time and not at all an "emotional reaction."
Greg
11:44 am on Monday, August 20, 2012
Rik, Read it again. I have only pointed out that the correct way to find a solution to a problem, is by honestly evaluating the facts related to the cause of the problem.
Your conclusions about my comments are wrong, because they are emotion based rather than fact based. Please do not put words in my mouth.
janie
12:01 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Maybe if people would pay attention their wouldnt be such a problem. The problem isn't the intersection, its the people behind the wheel not paying attention and speeding through town. idiot drivers are the cause of accidents..
MD from the area
1:17 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
My thoughts are with the drivers first we need to alert them with led light up signs directly above thier lanes az you come to the intersections mentioned wa also need to alert them with the rumpble stips in the road to spur thier cautious driving mode... I firmly feel the round abouts af far more pricey and for so many creats a fear that diminishes thier efficient usd of the round about and creates frustrations to those adept at thier efficient use. If the cheap bright led sings and warning grooves cut into the pavment are found to be inadequate. to curb these issues then abrige or overpass should be investigated to avoid a round about mayhem. To me the worst (deadliest) is cars from 32 south cutting over the north bound lanes. I always hear the valid complaint that at. Certain point all those signs in the median line up and block the view of the north bound cars but the bigger problem ive heard is people headed north bound getting hit there because they had thier right turn signal on and the crossing car assumed they were going to turn onto thier ramp sper but at the last moment didn't and kept going blinker and all... Again all i think could be done is a overpass or bridge if you will (a tunnel would be way cooler though) ... Just my observations and 2 cents
MD from the area
1:22 am on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Above I ment where southbound 32 traffic crosses over to hit southbound 43 as the deadliest intersection.
Missing Ozaukee Cty
9:25 pm on Saturday, August 18, 2012
Dave are you always such a jerk???
Susie Ropiak
11:29 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012
Yes, he is.
Terry
6:27 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
Yea. Pretty much all the time.
Missing Ozaukee Cty
6:22 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Any updates yet? It has been nearly a week now!
Dave
10:57 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012
Missing Ozaukee Cty it is in the same place and has not moved check the map
Terry
6:30 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
They make these things called punctuation Dave. Its is what makes things readable.
Greg
3:00 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012
Officers were called to an accident at the roundabout at the intersection of Highways LL and 33 about 12:20 p.m. Aug. 15.
A 19-year-old Port Washington woman was heading north in the roundabout when her 1997 Saturn was struck by a 2002 Buick driven by an 83-year-old
Saukville man who entered the traffic circle, police said.
The force of the collision caused the Saturn to spin onto the northeast sidewalk, police said.
The Saukville man was cited for failure to yield the right of way, according to police.
Greg
3:03 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012
Two vehicles — a southbound Honda Civic driven by a 44-year-old Port woman and an eastbound Buick Rendezvous driven by an 84-year-old Port man —
collided at the intersection of North Spring Street and Grand Avenue about 10:30 a.m. Aug. 13.
After the crash, the Buick struck a traffic signpost and a traffic signal pole before coming to rest on the sidewalk, police said.
Both drivers said they had a green light so they entered the intersection, police said.
Tanya Tappa
12:48 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012
Just wanted to let you know...it was HUNTER Watry, not Henry