patching...
Update: Share your opinions by becoming a Local Voices blogger. E-mail lyssa.beyer@patch.com for details.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Gov. Walker Vulnerable to Three Democratic Challengers, Poll Says

Though former U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold would win big, a new Public Policy Polling survey finds it would be a close race when Walker is matched up against just about any expected Democratic challenger.

 

It would be a photo finish in a gubernatorial recall race between Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and nearly any Democratic challenger, according to a poll released this week.

While the Public Policy Polling survey of 900 Wisconsin registered voters over the phone placed former U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold ahead of Walker by 7 percentage points in a head-to-head matchup — though he has said he is not interested in running — Walker either wins or loses by roughly 3 percentage points against other challengers.

That's different than two other notable polls on the election. A poll conducted in October by the same North Carolina-based survey company showed Walker topping all challengers. Additionally, another recent poll conducted by Charles Franklin of the Marquette University Law School shows Walker would beat all recall challengers by large margins.

According to the Public Policy Forum poll, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.27 percentage points, Walker is vulnerable against challenges from three Democratic hopefuls, and would edge out wins against five others in head-to-head matchups:

  • Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett leads Walker 49 percent to 46 percent;
  • Former Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk wins against Walker 48 percent to 47 percent;
  • U.S. Rep. Ron Kind of La Crosse comes out ahead of Walker 46 percent to 45 percent;
  • Walker beats former U.S. Rep. Dave Obey of Wausau 47 percent to 45 percent;
  • Walker beats state Sen. Jon Erpenbach of Middleton 47 percent to 44 percent;
  • Walker leads state Rep. Peter Barca of Kenosha 48 percent to 46 percent;
  • Walker leads Secretary of State Doug La Follette 46 percent to 45 percent;
  • Walker tops state Sen. Kathleen Vinehout 46 percent to 44 percent

State election officials have until March 19 to vet the 1 million petition signatures recall organizers submitted in early mid-January. The state Government Accountability Board, the agency that oversees elections, is also examining 850,000 signatures against Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch and another 80,000 in efforts against four state Republican lawmakers.

The agency is expected to ask a Dane County judge soon to grant it more time to certify the signatures, according to a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel report.

Falk, La Fottette and Vinehout have all announced their intentions to run against Walker, and the Democratic Party of Wisconsin has said it plans to hold a primary to vet the list of candidates.

Barrett, who hasn’t officially announced his candidacy but says he is still considering a run, leads all Democratic candidates in a primary with 45 percent of the vote, according to the poll. The poll says Falk would garner 18 percent and La Follette 14 percent. However, with Barrett taken out of the mix, Falk grabs 41 percent, La Follette 23 percent and Vinehout receives 13 percent.

The poll also showed Walker with a 47 percent approval rating and a 52 percent disapproval rating.

Related Topics: Kathleen Falk, Russ Feingold, Scott Walker, Tom Barrett, Walker Recall, Wisconsin Politics, and Wisconsin Recalls

Alfred

2:15 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Democrats win polls, not elections.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shripathi Kamath

11:02 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Yes, which is why John McCain is the President of the US

Comment_arrow

Keith Schmitz

6:59 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Three words that say an awful, and I mean awful, lot.

Comment_arrow

Wislady

4:35 pm on Tuesday, March 6, 2012

@Alfred.....And that is why democrats LOVE polls!

Steve

2:37 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Tight poll but all "losses" well within the margin of error. Not to mention impossible for anyone to accurately poll when there is no challenger yet.

Also poll oversampled union member which was at 29%. WI workers are about 14.2% union members. We all know how the union feels about being busted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

2:44 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

13.3 percent in 2011, down another percent from 2010

Comment_arrow

Matt

2:00 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Considering about half of the state votes, and givin that Gov. Walker has attacked union rights it is logical that close to 100% of union workers will go vote, that 29% seems closer to accurate, but yes they did get polled a little high, nice observation.

Comment_arrow

Steve

4:59 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Privileges, not rights just sayin ;)

That is assuming all private union employees feel the same way. Population of union membership in WI is 742,529. Barrett has a little over 1 million votes in 2010.

Alfred

2:56 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

These liberal moonbats are so predictable, I can't wait for one of these leftist Democrat candidates to run on raising taxes so the union stooges can have their cushy lifestyle back, it will be fun to watch them get further unhinged.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bren

3:04 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Alfred, I was confused by most of your invective, but regarding taxes, I'd rather pay a little more to help people instead of standing by while our state's poorest have to pay higher taxes because of Walker's cuts to the Eic and Homestead.

Comment_arrow

Alfred

3:10 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Well then Bren there is nothing stopping you at the moment to get out a check payable to the Wisconsin Dept of Revenue, I am pretty sure they will cash it. EIC is welfare that should be eliminated, and I dont even know what the hell homestead is, i just am sick and tired of being taxed, so much that I bought a place in a warmer state with no income taxes and property taxes of a mere $1000 for a big house, isnt that cool?

Comment_arrow

Kevin Roberts

7:28 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Alfred you don't understand..Libs don't want to pay more taxes themselves like Warren Buffet...they just want everyone ELSE to pay more so they can continue to live in the style to which their government checks have accustomed them.

Comment_arrow

Steve

11:23 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

I do my part every quarter Bren. Donate to the cause above and beyond.

http://www.revenue.wi.gov/

Comment_arrow

Bren

4:01 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Alfred, my point is that Scott Walker has indirectly raised taxes by cutting tax credits. I believe you are free to live where you wish, so congratulations on your new house.

Kevin, I believe most people, regardless of political affiliation, pay taxes, so cannot respond to your comment. Some links to legitimate news sources that support your position would be helpful.

Steve thanks for sharing that link and reminding me what I'll be doing all weekend...

Comment_arrow

mau

4:21 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Who is the judge and jury on this thread, who determines what are and what aren't legitimate news sources.

Bren

2:59 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Interesting that walker loses to challengers who haven't even announced. What will happen when the campaign ramps up and WIsconsinites can hear about the reasonable alternatives to Scott Walker/ALEC?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

3:45 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Exactly why you can't accurately poll candidates not running. No information has been spread to pin their character in a negative light. No information released on how they would run the state.

The poll is well within the margin of error. There is no losing on Walkers end on this one.

Comment_arrow

Lee Koepp

9:21 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

ALEC has probably written all of Scott Walker's programs. Many of the republicans are members of this nightmare of America. I wonder if Grover Norquist has Scott's signature? The following are Wisconsin signers of Norquist's pledge.: The pawns are:
WI-Sen Ron Johnson (R)
WI-01 Paul Ryan (R)
WI-05 Jim Sensenbrenner (R)
WI-06 Tom Petri (R)
WI-07 Sean Duffy (R)
WI-08 Reid Ribble (R)

Comment_arrow

Clark

2:01 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Interesting that this poll was taken by a democrat and is totally biased!!!
Good luck!

Alfred

3:04 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Bren its a poll, remember Democrats win polls not elections. Just ask Joanne Kloppenburg

Reply
Comment_arrow

Shripathi Kamath

11:03 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Or John McCain. Or Sarah Palin. One of them is even "Undefeated"

mau

3:38 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Wait until the Walker campaign starts using the ammunition against Barrett who used "Walker's tools" to save Milwaukee money and Falk pledges to her union handlers that she would veto a state budget that doesn't restore Act 10.

I am looking forward to the democrats who throw their hat into the ring, ripping each other a new arse hole. Let the circus begin :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Larry Banal

12:28 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

"the circus" began with walker's election

Comment_arrow

Walker

7:57 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

"ripping each other " is the way of the GOP or haven't you been paying attention to the circus going on in the Republican Presidential Primary?

Pete

4:10 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

That's the poll results when you take it at the union halls. Have any of you non-union members ever been polled?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keith Schmitz

7:01 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Why do you hate working men and women?

Comment_arrow

oak creek resident

11:05 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@ Keith Shitz
why do you keep using an ignorant rhetorical question in your posts? Why do YOU hate common sense?

Comment_arrow

JWU

12:42 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Keith Schitz: No one could possible hate a working man or woman. How could you even suggest that?

Comment_arrow

Bren

4:04 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

The number of recall petition signers makes it clear that more than public union employees (some 200,000) support the recall. AFP has done a fine job of ingraining the idea that the recall effort is only about unions. It is not.

Comment_arrow

Steve

4:52 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

The rest are democrats who can not accept the tough decisions that had to be made. It's not a key factor as I think you are trying to make. How many voted for Barret in 2010? It was more than 640,000. So why didn't that number sign the recall?

Comment_arrow

Bren

5:20 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Steve, I'm not a Democrat and I support the recall, which is not about making "tough decisions," but about making poor decisions. In where loyalties are placed, on using one's office to promote a national special interest agenda instead of representing the people one was elected to represent, etc.

How many voted for Barrett in 2010? 1,005,008 according to MSNBC.com (http://elections.msnbc.msn.com/ns/politics/2010/wisconsin/governor). The signatures turned in were about that number but as we know not all of them could be valid. I also know several people who didn't sign the recall petition but intend to vote against Walker in the upcoming election. But I agree with Lyle, it will be a very close race.

Comment_arrow

Steve

5:47 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Yes you are a moderate, but speak, at least here, to the very far left. So it's a losing argument.

You have 1 million lines on pages turned in. The real number is somewhere around 800,000 with about 20% "fraud" putting my prediction around 640,000 possible signatures.

The gap is 360,000 between those that voted for Barrett and those that signed.

So it is does not make it clear that more than just public union members support the recall.
You have 742,529 total union employees in the State. You have 640,000 valid signatures. Looking at the last election we can say that not all union members vote for a democrat.

I don't know if it will be close, need someone to run against first before you can lose.

Walker does not support the national entitlement idea. What we had before failed, there was no money left. We could have laid everyone off like Illinois but instead made the tough, right decisions to save a state. Walker is a patriot that will sacrifice a political career and make the tough decisions. You can only pander to a voter for so long before you are billions in debt like a democrat.

yeah yeah ALEC and Koch and fox news and whatever else.

Comment_arrow

mau

6:00 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Steve, why would anyone vote for Barrett when the hypocrit wanted to use the tools Walker provided to balance the Milwaukee budget. Or Falk who promised the unions that she would veto any state budget that didn't include repealing Act 10. Hold the state budget hostage and this isn't a union issue? Bull.

Comment_arrow

Steve

6:15 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

To be a liberal is to be a hypocrite. They will excuse that hypocrisy because Walker is evil and stuff. Don't worry Bren you're not a liberal so this is nothing against you.

I hope this answered your question mau. If not watch some of this

http://www.youtube.com/user/donsmithshow#p/u/9/IlIS6gRq32Q

Comment_arrow

Bren

7:31 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Steve, I write here primarily on the Walker recall, and my view on that subject I believe is undisputed.

I understood that approximately 1m signatures were turned in. I agree it's correct to assume that not every union member in the state supports the recall. If I were pro-Walker I'd concentrate efforts on the recall election.

Remember that public employees had already made a round of concessions under Doyle (furloughs), creating a precedent for contract negotiations. Union-busting is part of the national ALEC agenda and is occurring in other states (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/04/business/04labor.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1). Same with the 2011 corporate tax breaks.

Wisconsin was not "broke," budget issues yes, but this was the same type of "manufactured crisis" gambit that Walker used to justify firing courthouse security workers as CE (illegally). (Here's an interesting book to read about manufactured crises: http://www.amazon.com/Manufactured-Crisis-Attack-Americas-Schools/dp/0201441969).

We'll have to disagree about Walker's "patriotism." I don't describe putting the interests of Pfizer, Exxon Mobile, Koch Industries, etc., before the people who elected him to represent their interests as "patriotism." His latest legislation weakens wetlands regulations and opens the door to the controversial mining project. He stands to make irreparable changes to our state's environment and quality of education for a tens of thousands of public school children.

Angela Mcclure

9:03 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I have never worked for a union, or paid a dime to, or received a dime from, any union. Ever. I am none the less a sane, rational individual, who is not deaf, dumb, blind, or naive, and scott walker has got to go. Asap. Period. I live in wisconsin every day, I see.daily the harm he has.caused. to my technical college, to our unified schools, to my own childrens private school, to my educator friends, my state employee friends, my low income friends, to our tax returns, our unemployment, the only good thing, and I mean ONLY good thing that has come out of this past year of living nightmares, is the millions of people who have united against the db to get rid of him and restore our state to one of normalcy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JWU

2:10 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Angela Mcclure: WOW! You have experienced a nightmare. Can you provide some specifics, or do you prefer leaving us with an emotional rant?

Comment_arrow

oak creek resident

2:55 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

LOL wow, just wow. 80% of the population now has lower taxes and a better business climate exists here. Compare wisconsin to what recently happened in illinois, see what happens when you do what liberals like you want.

Comment_arrow

oak creek resident

2:57 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Tax returns? LMAO what you wanted your taxes to go up instead of down? You are a shill and a fake. That fact that you are putting periods in the middle of sentences, and that you can't even write a coherent paragraph, tells lots about your mindset.

Go leach off the public somewhere else.

Comment_arrow

Steve

3:15 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I'd really like to hear some examples of this harm.

Normalcy = Doyle years where we had billions in debt and a system that paid off cronies and ran business out of the state?

It's funny the ones you meet on the internet that live in a bubble and are unable to make the tough decisions like Walker has, and what the state elected him to do. It's a good thing Walker does not pander for every vote and look to the next election. He is able to make the tough decisions and fix a state the was broke, literally.

morninmist

10:22 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Wanggaard is like Walker---make up and pass legislation for their own benefit! Both will go down!

http://rootriversiren.blogspot.com/2012/03/wanggaard-needs-one-good-democrat.html?spref=tw

Thursday, March 1, 2012
Wanggaard Needs One Good Democrat
It's crunch time for Van Wanggaard and his bill to repeal the Milwaukee residency rule for police and firefighters...they invested quite a few dollars in his campaign and it's time to make good.

The Milwaukee Police and Firefighter's have given Van $5,200 - $4,000 since January in return for a bill that will end the residency rule favored by area legislators, including Tom Barrett.

Interestingly, Van's bill does not effect residency rules for other municipalities and it does not end the rule for other Milwaukee public employees.

Why? Because they didn't give him any fucking money, that's why.

So while Van has taken a strong stance against prohibitive and un-American residency requirements, he's only willing to fight for a select few...who happened to have written him a check. What an asshole.

Back to the bill...Van doesn't have the votes in committee to pass the bill, so he plans to take it directly to the State Senate, but single-mom hater, Glenn Grothman will not vote in favor of it. That leaves Wanny needing one Democrat who is willing to vote in favor of a bill that preferentially treats one labor group over another with yet another special rule based on campaign dollars. Good luck with that....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bren

9:17 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I'm not in Van Wanggaard's district, but note that he is a retired police officer and public employee pension recipient who supported the stripping of collective bargaining rights from public employees except fire and--police.

The residency requirement is favored in Milwaukee in part because having law enforcement living in the neighborhood improves the quality of the neighborhood.

William Fink

10:31 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

MODERN VERSION of the Old Ant and Grasshopper Story: Ant works hard all summer long, building a house and preparing food for winter. Grasshopper calls Ant a fool, dancing the summer away. Come winter, Grasshopper calls a press conference wanting to know why Ant should be allowed to be warm and fed while he is starving. The media provides pictures of shivering Grasshopper next to Ant in his comfortable home. America is stunned by the sharp contrast. A nation asks, how can Grasshopper be allowed to suffer? Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with Grasshopper and they cry when singing, 'It's Not Easy Being Green'. Occupy the Anthill demonstrates in front of Ant's house where the SEIU sings, We shall overcome. Nancy Pelosi exclaims to Larry King that Ant has gotten rich off the back of Grasshopper, drafting a tax hike on Ant making him pay his fair share. EEOC drafts Economic Equity/Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of summer. Ant is fined for failing to hire union green bugs and cannot pay retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the Govt GreenCzar and given to Grasshopper. Finally, Grasshopper eats Ant's food while Ant's old house crumbles because Grasshopper doesn't maintain it. Ant disappears in the snow, never to be seen again. Grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the now abandoned house is taken over by Spider Gang who terrorize the once peaceful neighborhood.
MORAL OF THE STORY: Be careful how you vote in 2012 and the Recall.

Reply
Comment_arrow

oak creek resident

11:08 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Perfect analogy.
Now Keith Shitz, who cannot read or think for himself, will ask you: "Why do you hate hard working men and women?", not knowing that he and his ilk are the grasshoppers.

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

12:23 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

So, all the teachers, most of which have masters degrees, who educate our children all day and take night or summer classes to keep up their certifications for a messily 50k a year are lazy leaches? I'd like to see your educational status, most people who failed out of college look up to the poster boy Walker for inspiration. Don't worry about not being too bright, you too can be a governor some day.

Comment_arrow

JWU

12:37 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member: Teachers don't make a messily $50K per year at RUSD. You forgot to add in that 40-60% fringe and then remember that it's all paid for a 9 month work year. So that messily $50k that YOU speak about is actually worth $93K on an annualized basis. That doesn't sound messily to many. And let's not forget that retirement package that teachers only pay a "messily" sum into and then walk away with a 7 figure retirement benefit.

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

1:16 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@JWU Your right teachers start much lower than that, in the 30k to 40k range, I was taking the pay from teachers with 10 to 20 years experience. If you have your employer do a cost workup on any employee you will see that the cost with fringe as you call it is 50-75% higher than the income of the individual. Every employee at my place of employment had it done and that was the result. It was much more inexpensive for the state to manage a few contracts than pay administrators to manage tens of thousands of contracts. The 7 figure salaries and retirement benefits are for the coaches that no one seems to mind paying. If you don't like the pension program then you end the pension program, you don't create more laws to limit more of our rights.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

1:24 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Which of 'your' rights have been limited 'non'union member?

Comment_arrow

JWU

1:46 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member: Base reached pay at RUSD with 10-20 years is about $72,000 and with fringe annualizes [12 month year] at a whopping $144,000. Retirement is valued at more than $50,000 per year [excluding the true value of healthcare benefits'] and with a life expectancy of 20 years, that's a $1,000,000 CASH benefit for teachers.

Comment_arrow

Walker

1:56 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Dang! If that's true, I don't wanna kill them, I wanna join them. Where do I sign up?

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

2:24 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@CowDung - You or I can no longer bargain with the state collectively, a right that has been taken away.
@JWU - That is simply not true I have seen the payment schedules and non go up that high unless your a some type of coach in which case the rules are broken for some reason. I even went to the salary datamine and tried to find someone, randomly, with a high salary and the highest I found was 67k.

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

2:31 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

The Declaration of Independence was signed in "order to form a more perfect union". And yes it is the same thing as a workers union, it is people uniting in order to not be exploited. Putting laws in place against unions is as un-American as laws banning guns. If you don't like them don't join, if they get too much - renegotiate, if they get to big - break them but don't pass laws prohibiting them.

Comment_arrow

JWU

2:40 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member: Well if we go with the $67,000 that you found and the average fringe for RUSD of $35,165, we arrive at a 12 month annualized pay of $136,000. That is far from what you referred to as messily. Add to that the $1million cash payout, over 20 years, on the teacher retirement benefit [excluding the cost of healthcare insurrance] and you have a package that NO small business CEO's will never get from their employer.

Comment_arrow

Steve

3:24 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

You can not negotiate with tax dollars especially when there are no representation from the tax payer.

Collective bargaining was never a right it was a privilege. One that the unions took advantage of year after year after year with political help. It was banned because it needed to be as it was destructive to those that pay the bills.

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

3:30 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@JWU - I don't know what your smoking but it must be pretty good based on the things your seeing. Give me a few names or some kind of facts to back that up please.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

3:43 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Nonunion member:

I've never had the ability to bargain collectively with the state--nothing has been taken away from me.

The 'right' to bargain collectively has only been limited when it comes to members of public sector unions. If one is a member of a private sector union, or not a union member at all, their ability to engage in collective bargaining remains unchanged.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

3:46 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

If you are going to bicker about the numbers for RUSD, visit the JS Online's database of teacher salaries so we can settle on actual numbers.

RUSD average teacher salary is $53,288 with $35,165 in fringe benefits for 2009-2010 school year.

http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/dataondemand/33534649.html

Click on the 'Statewide list of average teacher salaries by school district.' link.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

3:50 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Non-nonunion Member:

The issue with renegotiating with public employee unions, is that the unions tend to negotiate with the same people that their campaign donations helped put into office. It isn't the same adversarial relationship between negotiating parties that we have in the private sector.

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

4:01 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

JWU thank you for posting the same numbers that I have been quoting, they are no where near $130k you mentioned earlier, and again for those that are a little slow every employee cost their employer outside of salary so those "fringe" costs are a wash. I will not even get into the fact that the state manages public employees for less than it is done in the private sector. I do want to know why no one wants to talk about year round school and the elimination of sports?

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

4:02 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Sorry JWU it was CowDung who posted the real salaries.

Comment_arrow

Bren

4:08 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I have to ask, what is inappropriate about a salary in the $60/$70K range for an individual with a Master's degree?

Comment_arrow

CowDung

4:18 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Non-nonunion Member:

While I think that the elimination of sports would be a terrible mistake, year round schooling has some definite advantages...

Comment_arrow

JWU

4:36 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@CowDung: I couldn't imagine year round public education put on by the Racine Unified School District given the current level of mediocre results and wholesale mismanagement by RUSD. The longer the child is in RUSD, the further behind they fall from the State average test score. I am not interested in hearing the teachers blame the parents, the goals not being achievable and on and on. It comes down to a horrendously expensive school system that completely fails to educate our children. I am delighted that parents are using vouchers to transfer their children OUT of RUSD.

Maybe the situation is better in your area.

Comment_arrow

mau

5:54 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@JWU, they do have year round school in RUSD at Janes Elementary. They just don't brag about it. They tried to get a middle school year round at Gilmore but that was a failure because they couldn't get enough parents and teachers to participate.

http://www.racine.k12.wi.us/?do=schools.content&pageID=43

Comment_arrow

Clark

7:39 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IS NOT A RIGHT!!!!!!!!

That's a privilege!

Walker

2:58 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

"Annualized" now there's a number that will pay your bills. I'm sure the banks would love to use an "annualized" income to finance your house. "Hey, my income from 6 months of commercial fishing is $60k so for credit purposes let's use my "annualized" number of $120k!" Yeah, that'll fly. What a tool. Nothing to get angry about except imaginary numbers?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JWU

3:06 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Walker. The fact that you make $60,000 for 6 months of commercial fishing is not bad at all. Unless you waste the other 6 months doing nothing. In that case, you will ONLY make $60,000 per year and you're a putz for wasting the other 6 months that could earn you more. A teacher gets paid for a 9 month job and they have the same choice that you have to work the other months or sit on you can and do nothing but cry that you only make $60,000 per year and I owe you something for your hardship.

Comment_arrow

Walker

3:14 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

WOW! You certainly are clairvoyant. I guess I shouldn't question such an intelligent angry being! It was an example of how rediculous your "annualized" imaginary number is; but I guess your blinders won't allow your little mind to get off it's narrow track & see how silly you look. (No, I'm not a teacher or a union member. Just don't care for bullies. I'd certainly be disappointed if you didn't turn that into something it's not clairvouyant one.) Have a great day!

Comment_arrow

JWU

3:26 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Enjoy your $60,000 for your 6 months of fishing that defines your "work year". And don't come back and whine that you only make $60,000 a year without first explaining that you only work 6 months. Jeez, sorry this is over your head.

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

3:27 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Imaginary numbers is right, we are talking real take home pay here. I once got paid $150 an hour for consulting that does not mean I make $300k a year. Teachers usually get jobs or take classes to keep up certs during the summer. Also, if you're mad about summers off keep school in session year round that's what the other countries that are kicking our buts do. My problem with Walker is he did not solve the problem he skirted it. Eliminate the pensions, summer vacation, and sports in schools, but keep teachers competitively paid and cooperating together, tough decisions and a lot of work but necessary to keep pace globally.

Comment_arrow

Walker

3:30 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I knew you wouldn't disappoint me! Your kind is so predictable. Love to say they know what someone is thinking. Yeah, we see who's head it's above. But then you're always right & never wrong.

Comment_arrow

JWU

3:31 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Enjoy the fishing Gilligan.

Comment_arrow

JWU

3:46 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member ...put this in your pipe and smoke it. You seem to be familiar with such practices.

Oh, To Be a Teacher in Wisconsin
How can fringe benefits cost nearly as much as a worker's salary? Answer: collective bargaining.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703408604576164290717724956.html

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

4:14 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@JWU - They don't cost nearly as much you yourself said 40% which is lower than the private employers.

Comment_arrow

JWU

4:17 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703408604576164290717724956.html

"The showdown in Wisconsin over fringe benefits for public employees boils down to one number: 74.2. That's how many cents the public pays Milwaukee public-school teachers and other employees for retirement and health benefits for every dollar they receive in salary. The corresponding rate for employees of private firms is 24.3 cents."

oak creek resident

3:00 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member,

Take your fcking lies elsewhere about teacher pay. The AVERAGE, not the top, the AVERAGE MPS teacher is pulling in over 100,000 per year with benefits.

Take your lies somewhere else, or is that the only way an irrational fool like you can try to make your point?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

3:20 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I'm basing it on published numbers in the data mine. I think your being lied to. BTW the whole "with benefits" thing is a joke, like I said before the cost of any employee outside of salary is huge so if it's public or private the cost is there and is a wash.

Comment_arrow

Steve

3:43 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

A wash? What does the money fall from space and just appear in the treasury? No wonder we were in a budget fiasco with a mindset like that. When you own a business you calculate your payroll of salary and benefits. If you don't well you won't be around very long and won't be able to pay taxes which pay for all those public worker benefits.

One of the best things Walker did was remove collective bargaining. This allowed school districts to get away from the over charging WEAC, reduce their bennifit spending and increase it's quality. If you can provide one teacher the same benefits but instead of paying $20,000/yr you are now paying 14,000/yr it adds up.

Comment_arrow

JWU

3:45 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member ...put this in your pipe and smoke it. You seem to be familiar with such practices.

Oh, To Be a Teacher in Wisconsin
How can fringe benefits cost nearly as much as a worker's salary? Answer: collective bargaining.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703408604576164290717724956.html

Comment_arrow

JWU

3:57 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Nonunion Member: your "wash" comment reminds me of a person I read about that claimed he/she should not be given overdraft charges on returned checks in the account because the overdraft was not caused by bouncing checks, it was caused by ATM withdrawals that should count towards an overdraft on a retuned check check.

Your accounting sounds a bit ridiculous that the taxpayer should not consider the $$$ cost of fringe benefits for teachers because it is a "wash" with the amount paid to the private sector? So the fringe is paid with magic money?

Comment_arrow

Nonunion Member

4:13 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

@Steve - When I say "a wash" I mean that the fringe benefits are paid to employees weather they are public or private union or non union. The real disscussion is the base salary which at ~60k is minimal for someone with a masters.
I did take a look at your article and again they are saying salary with benefits, and MPS are the highest paid in WI because the cost of living is high.

Comment_arrow

Steve

4:43 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I don't see how the cost of living in Milwaukee is high. Most of the homes have almost no value left to them unless you live in a very upper end neighborhood. It's not LA, it's run down Milwaukee.

You have to account for the total expense of an employee. Especially one that receives a pension. Gosh that would be nice.

Prime example of how a piece of paper does not automatically = tons of money. Teachers get masters partially for personal pride but mainly for income gain. The more degrees you have the more you are paid in the school system. Don't know for sure but I bet they get help from the district to pay for that education.

They also are not building the space shuttle with the degree. They are teaching children. I don't want to knock what they do, but it is just teaching. They generate no profit for a company, they are not inventing any new products. They are following a state controlled curriculum.

$67K, for maybe 8 months of work, not bad especially when they knew the pay structure before coming or continuing to be a teacher. Work the 2-3 months in the summer, profit more.

JWU

4:14 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703408604576164290717724956.html

"The showdown in Wisconsin over fringe benefits for public employees boils down to one number: 74.2. That's how many cents the public pays Milwaukee public-school teachers and other employees for retirement and health benefits for every dollar they receive in salary. The corresponding rate for employees of private firms is 24.3 cents."

Reply

Keith Best

10:46 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Did you know the website to recall Gov. Walker was registered the night of the election November 2010??? This nonsense recall is all about Democrats lost and they can't handle it.
Gov. Walkers reforms are working. To see how check out
www.itsworkingwisconsin.com
www.reforms.wi.gov

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

12:05 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

Interesting Keith. I know the internet and have checked this out.
recallscottwalker.com

Record created on 02-Nov-2010
Administrative Contact:
Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0125288799, recallscottwalker.com@contactprivacy.com
96 Mowat Ave
Toronto, ON M6K 3M1
CA
+1.4165385457
Technical Contact:
Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0125288799, recallscottwalker.com@contactprivacy.com
96 Mowat Ave
Toronto, ON M6K 3M1
CA
+1.4165385457
Registrant:
Contact Privacy Inc. Customer 0125288799
96 Mowat Ave
Toronto, ON M6K 3M1
CA

Canadia eh

Domain name: RECALLSCOTTWALKER.COM

Comment_arrow

JWU

3:46 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

Bright to you by the same party that hid in Illinois because they couldn't have it their way.

Comment_arrow

Keith Schmitz

7:32 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

So what. This wouldn't have gone any where unless people were pissed off.

Someone was thinking ahead.

If you want to blame anybody, blame it on disengaged voters who did not fully check out Walker and after they saw him they were shocked. Many of us could have predicted this.

Year two of the school and muni budgets coming up. Iceberg dead ahead.

morninmist

2:51 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

One of the recent polls said that Walker is losing support with women. The signing of this backwards bill will lose him more support.

America United ‏ @Progress2day


RT @spudlovr: Scott Walker's signature is last step to repeal of Wisconsin's Equal Pay Enforcement Act dailykos.com/story/2012/02/… #wiunion #p2

Reply
Comment_arrow

JWU

3:47 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

dailykos, not surprising

Comment_arrow

Keith Schmitz

7:32 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

Whistling past the graveyard JWU?

Comment_arrow

morninmist

8:07 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

@Keith S...

This report was put out about 2 weeks ago--about 40plus school districts who are in deep trouble for this years budget. It will updated periodically.

"The second year of the budget is going to be worse for many school districts.
Schools did save last budget year--but it was a one time savings. Now the bones will have to be cut. Polls will get tighter as these districts realize the impact of Walker's cuts. Education is and always has been of high value to Wisconsinites. "

http://gallery.mailchimp.com/7126ec513f66440e67bfd72aa/files/Schools_Shortages.pdf

Comment_arrow

Steve

8:37 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

You guys have WAY too much time to make these pie in the sky pdfs. Use the creativity to create something, like a job. That job would create tax revenue which would help the school districts.

Unless, you really could care less about the school district and the entire motivation is Walker busting your gravy train.

JWU

8:34 am on Friday, March 2, 2012

It's not a surprise. School districts have spent like drunken sailors and for the most part have failed to provide the results. RUSD spent $10million on a new headquarters that did ZERO to improve the educational results of 1 child. Thanks to Walker, the school boards which have been historically stacked with those that promoted fiscal irresponsibility and educational failure is coming to an end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

KI

8:49 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

@morninmist

I'm not sure what state you are speaking of when you state that "Education is and always has been of high value to Wisconsinites" when the numbers show that people have been ignoring the output of the school districts since the 90s.

WI spends more than any other mid-west state, and consistently produces below average students. There is not, has not, and never will be a direct correlation between what you spend on the schools and what kind of students are a product of that school. If you really need an example of this, look no further than DC. They spend upwards of 16K per student and show a graduation rate of less than 50%.

Money =/= Results

Keith Best

7:47 am on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

More and more peoiple are realizing that Gov. Walker's reforms are working.
That's why he will win this nonsense recall.

Check it out for yourself:
www.itsworkingwisconsin.com

www.reforms.wi.gov

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

6:58 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

ha ha.
More and more people are realizing that Walker tells big LIES!

Comment_arrow

morninmist

8:25 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The only thing working for Walker is that the Doe probe is moving closer to HIM!

We Are Wisconsin ‏ @WeRWisconsin

VIDEO - Pls RT: Brkng news report on latest top @GovWalker aide implicated in criminal probe http://bit.ly/GRFqI7 #WIunion #WIrecall
View video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN6UseVbIaM

Leave a comment